Appeal No. 2004-0316
Application 09/136,619
medium of the photo image of video images as well. Consistent
with the examiner's rationale and the teachings identified
earlier at the initial portion of column 1 of Wen, prior
art/conventional index prints contain a numeric identifier
corresponding to each image and therefore its location on the
opposite or image data surface of the CDS. These conventional
index prints map the location of each of the respective
individual index prints to the respect images in their
corresponding, relative location among the digital data on the
disk itself.
Finally, we note that dependent claims 25-28 recite a
specific detail (a frame number) of what the generic "marking" is
in their parent independent claims. By implication therefore,
our affirmance of the rejection of claims 25-28 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 applies equally well to their parent independent claims
even though no express rejection of them has been made under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting various claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007