The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte TODD CHRISTOPHER, BARTH ALAN CANFIELD
and STEVEN WAYNE PATTON
Appeal No. 2004-0317
Application No. 09/319,822
ON BRIEF
Before KRASS, BARRY and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-14.
The invention pertains to processing video signals for
display. In particular, a processor receives both a high-
definition signal and a standard definition signal, converts the
standard definition signal to a format compatible with the high-
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007