Appeal No. 2004-0327 Application No. 09/689,194 of the invention. Scripps Clinic & Research Found. v. Genentech Inc., 927 F.2d 1565, 1576, 18 USPQ2d 1001, 1010 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Independent claim 1 recites an adhesive bandage adapted to be applied to a user’s skin wound. The claim requires the bandage to comprise, inter alia, a pad portion and an adhesive portion on the rear surface of the backing layer. As persuasively argued by the appellant (see, for example, pages 6 through 8 in the main brief), Hasse does not teach such a bandage. To begin with, a person of ordinary skill in the art would not consider Hasse’s sanitary napkin to be an adhesive bandage adapted to be applied to a user’s skin wound. The examiner’s reasoning to the contrary (see page 4 in the answer) is, at best, quite strained. A person of ordinary skill in the art also would not view Hasse’s pad portion (absorbent core 28) and adhesive portion (adhesive layer 90), which lie on opposite surfaces of backsheet 26, to be on the rear surface of a backing layer. The examiner’s interpretation of Hasse’s topsheet 24 and backsheet 26 as collectively composing a backing layer wherein the backsheet 26 is the rear surface thereof (see page 5 in the answer) rests on an unreasonable interpretation of both the Hasse disclosure, which clearly indicates that the topsheet and 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007