Ex Parte Cantor - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2004-0327                                                        
          Application No. 09/689,194                                                  

          claims 5 and 7, and dependent claim 8, as being unpatentable over           
          Hasse in view of Bernardin.                                                 
          IV. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 6 and 9 as being             
          unpatentable over Hasse in view of Bernardin and Fischel-Ghodsian           
               As Fischel-Ghodsian does not overcome the above noted                  
          deficiencies of Hasse and Bernardin relative to the subject                 
          matter recited in parent claims 5 and 7, we shall not sustain the           
          standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 6 and 9           
          as being unpatentable over Hasse in view of Bernardin and                   
          Fischel-Ghodsian.                                                           





















                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007