Appeal No. 2004-0327 Application No. 09/689,194 claims 5 and 7, and dependent claim 8, as being unpatentable over Hasse in view of Bernardin. IV. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 6 and 9 as being unpatentable over Hasse in view of Bernardin and Fischel-Ghodsian As Fischel-Ghodsian does not overcome the above noted deficiencies of Hasse and Bernardin relative to the subject matter recited in parent claims 5 and 7, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 6 and 9 as being unpatentable over Hasse in view of Bernardin and Fischel-Ghodsian. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007