Ex Parte LIPARI et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No.  2004-0494                                                          Page 2                  
                 Application No.  09/215,831                                                                            
                 Lacy et al. (Lacy)                 5,645,856                   Jul. 8, 1997                           
                                             GROUND OF REJECTION                                                        
                        Claims 1, 3-5, 12, 14, 16 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                        
                 being unpatentable over Lacy.                                                                          
                        We reverse.                                                                                     
                                                    DISCUSSION                                                          
                        Appellants’ claims are drawn to a composition and method of using the                           
                 composition.  As set forth above, claim 1 is drawn to a composition consisting of                      
                 (1) a fibrate, which can be fenofibrate (see e.g., appellants’ claim 3 and                             
                 appellants’ specification page 3, lines 28-31), and (2) at least one monoglyceride,                    
                 which can be glyceryl caprylate, glyceryl oleate, or glyceryl caprylate/caprate                        
                 (see e.g., appellants’ claim 4 and appellants’ specification page 3, lines 33-36).                     
                        According to the examiner (Answer, page 3), “Lacy discloses                                     
                 compositions containing fenofibrate.  …  Although Lacy does not teach                                  
                 compositions containing only monoglycerides, it is deemed obvious to one of                            
                 ordinary skill in the art [at the time the invention was made] to remove any                           
                 component of Lacy if that compound is deemed unnecessary….”  In response                               
                 appellants assert (Brief, page 3), “an essential element of the Lacy carrier                           








                                                                                                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007