Ex Parte Foster et al - Page 1


                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                         
                     for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                                                 Paper No. 25                                                           

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                                                                                       
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                                                                                       
                                Ex parte RONALD R. FOSTER and RAYMOND WU                                                
                                                                                                                       
                                                Appeal No. 2004-0547                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/536,894                                                 
                                                                                                                       
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                                                                                       

              Before  FLEMING, LEVY, and NAPPI,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                         
              rejection of claims 1 through 9, 13 and 14.                                                               
                     The invention relates to a remote video telephone system that makes use of a                       
              base video unit and remote video units.  A user of the system can communicate with the                    
              base video unit through a standard telephone connection (see page 4 of appellants’                        
              specification).  The base unit also communicates with the remote video units (see page                    
              5 of appellants’ specification).  Through the base unit a user can select which of the                    
              remote video units to communicate with (see page 7 of appellants’ specification).                         

                                                           1                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007