Appeal No. 2004-0547
Application No. 09/536,894
Claims 4 and 6 through 8 all ultimately depend upon claim 1 and necessarily
contain the same limitations addressed above with respect to claim 1. The examiner’s
rejections of claims 4 and 6 though 8, rely upon the teachings of Yamadera in view of
Lazik in combination with Mun or Gerszberg, or Ratner. The examiner has not shown,
nor do we find that Mun, Gerszberg, or Ratner teach or suggest automatically routing
signals through the base video unit to said caller without the need for human
intervention. Thus, for the reasons stated supra concerning the rejection of claim 1, we
will not sustain the examiner’s rejections of claims 4, 6 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. §
103.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007