Appeal No. 2004-0581
Application No. 09/041,105
Therefore, we also will sustain the examiner’s Section
103 rejection of independent claim 10 and of nonargued dependent
claim 11 as being unpatentable of Shimizu. Likewise, we will
sustain the examiner’s Section 103 rejection of nonargued
dependent claim 12 as being unpatentable over Shimizu in view of
Kihara.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007