Ex Parte Desikan et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0599                                                        
          Application No. 09/843,554                                                  

               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          novel composition of mixed alkylphenols, where the ratio of                 
          ortho- to meta- and para- isomers is no more than about 1.0, the            
          amount of 2,6-dialkyl phenol is from about 0.5% to 3%, and the              
          amount of trialkyl phenol is from about 4% to about 75% and the             
          alkyl group is isopropyl (Brief, page 2).  Representative                   
          independent claim 18 is reproduced below:                                   
               18. A composition comprising mixed alkylphenols wherein the            
          ratio of ortho- to meta- and para- isomers is no more than about            
          1.0, the amount of 2,6-dialkyl phenol is from about 0.5% to 3%,             
          by weight of the entire composition, and the amount of trialkyl             
          phenol is from about 4% to about 75%, by weight of the entire               
          composition, wherein the alkyl is isopropyl.                                
               The examiner has relied upon Terhune et al. (Terhune), U.S.            
          Patent No. 3,936,410, issued Feb. 3, 1976, as the sole evidence             
          of obviousness (Answer, page 3, ¶(9)).  Accordingly, claims 18-19           
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over                
          Terhune (Answer, page 3, ¶(10)).2  We reverse the rejection on              
          appeal for reasons stated below.                                            
          OPINION                                                                     


               2We note that the final rejection of claim 18 under section            
          102(b) as anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,275,248 (Paper No. 12,           
          page 3) has been withdrawn by the examiner (see the Advisory                
          Action, Paper No. 14, and the Answer, page 2, ¶(6)).  We also               
          note that this application is a divisional application of                   
          application no. 09/241,911, Appeal No. 2003-0801, in which a                
          decision on appeal was mailed Jul. 30, 2003 (Paper No. 17).                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007