The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RALPH D. YODER and RONALD E. STROHBEHN __________ Appeal No. 2004-06471 Application No. 09/941,965 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-7, the only claims remaining. Claims 1 and 4-6 are representative: 1. A treated and isolated IgG fraction, comprising: acid hydrolyzed IgG fraction which has been heated for from 15 minutes to 1 hour at a temperature of from 35°C to 40°C, and thereafter neutralized, centrifuged and decanted. 4. The treated and isolated IgG fraction of claim 1 which has a molecular weight of about 55,000. 5. The treated and isolated IgG fraction of claim 1 wherein the IgG fraction is derived from the sources selected from the group consisting of bovine or porcine blood or colostrum, egg or whey. 6. The treated and isolated IgG fraction of claim 5 wherein the IgG is derived from bovine blood. The references relied on by the examiner are: 1 As a preliminary matter, we note that this appeal is related to an appeal in application serial no. 09/772,603 (Appeal No. 2004-0646). We have considered the two appeals together.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007