Ex Parte Yoder et al - Page 2



              Appeal No. 2004-0647                                                                Page 2                
              Application No. 09/941,965                                                                                
              Sprotte et al. (Sprotte)           5,871,731                          Feb. 16, 1999                       
              Bier                               6,096,310                          Aug. 1, 2000                        
              Stephan et al. (Stephan), “Antibodies from Colostrum in Oral Immunotherapy,” J. Clin.                     
              Chem. Clin. Biochem., Vol. 28, pp. 19-23 (1990)                                                           
              Kempf et al. (Kempf), “Virus Inactivation During Production of Intravenous                                
              Immunoglobulin,” Transfusion, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 423-427 (1991)                                          
              Hatta et al. (Hatta), “Productivity and Some Properties of Egg Yolk Antibody (IgY)                        
              against Human Rotavirus Compared with Rabbit IgG,” Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., Vol.                        
              57, No. 3, pp. 450-454 (March 1993)                                                                       
                     The claims stand rejected as follows:                                                              
                     I. Claims 1, 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hatta.                             
                     II. Claims 1-3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Hatta.                                   
                     III. Claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kempf.                                  
                     IV. Claims 1, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kempf or                          
              Hatta, each in view of Bier or Sprotte.                                                                   
                     V. Claims 1, 5 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kempf or                           
              Hatta, each in view of Stephan.                                                                           
                     We reverse all of these rejections.                                                                
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     “[I]n the past, bovine and porcine blood [sera have] been orally administered to                   
              aid domesticated livestock . . . in weight gain and overall health” (Specification, page 3,               
              emphasis in the original).  The present invention is directed to “a treated and isolated                  
              IgG fraction,” specifically, an “acid hydrolyzed IgG fraction which has been heated for                   
              from 15 minutes to 1 hour at a temperature of from 35°C to 40°C, and thereafter                           
              neutralized, centrifuged and decanted” (see claim 1).  According to the specification,                    
              upon acid hydrolysis, a bovine IgG fraction “turns quite viscous initially, and thereafter,               
              upon neutralization back to a pH of about 7, becomes substantially less viscous.                          
              [When] the material is centrifuged, [ ] the supernatant contains the desired fraction of                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007