Ex Parte Chang et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0682                                                        
          Application No. 09/547,152                                                  

               (c) a collector region located on the other side of the base           
          region and further comprising a layer of a second n-type-doped              
          semiconductor having a bandgap energy greater than or equal to              
          the bandgap energy of the InGaAsN base region; and                          
               (d) electrode forming separate electrical connections to               
          each of the collector, emitter and base regions of the                      
          transistor.                                                                 
          We use the answer of Paper No. 16, mailed June 4, 2003.                     
               The examiner relies upon the following art references as               
          evidence of unpatentability:                                                
          Liu et al. (Liu)             6,031,256           Feb. 29, 2000             
          Yagura et al. (Yagura)        6,188,137           Feb. 13, 2001             
          Matsuno et al. (Matsuno)                                                    
          (Japanese)                   JP40505095              Mar. 26,             
          1993                                                                        
          Xin et al. (Xin), “Annealing behavior of p-type Ga0.892In0.108NxAs1-        
          x(0 ≤ x  ≤ 0.24)Grown by gas-source molecular beam epitaxy,”                
          Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 75, No. 10, pages 1416-1418 (July             
          1999).                                                                      
               Claims 1-4, 7, 8, 19, 21, and 22 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Liu in view of Xin.              
               Claims 15, 16, 17, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Liu and Xin and further in view            
          of Yagura.                                                                  
               Claims 23 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Liu and Xin and further in view of                  
          Matsuno.                                                                    

                                        OPINION                                       
               For the reasons set forth in the brief, and below, we                  
          reverse each of the rejections.                                             



                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007