Appeal No. 2004-0700
Application No. 09/531,671
It follows that we also hereby sustain the examiner’s
section 103 rejection of claims 16, 22, 27-29, 34, 35, 37 and 38
as being unpatentable over Khandros in view of Sato.
The other section 103 rejections advanced by the examiner
have not been separately contested by the appellant on this
appeal. See In re Dance, 160 F.3d 1339, 1340, n.2, 48 USPQ2d
1635, 1636, n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1998) and In re Nielson, 816 F.2d
1567, 1571, 2 USPQ2d 1525, 1528; compare In re McDaniel, 293 F.3d
1379, 1382-85, 63 USPQ2d 1462, 1464-66 (Fed. Cir. 2002). Thus,
we likewise hereby sustain these section 103 rejections for
reasons which correspond to those earlier stated.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007