Ex Parte LIU et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0721                                                               
          Application No. 09/401,409                                                         

          dielectric material directly on a pad and lines of a                               
          topographical substrate, depositing an oxide on the low-k                          
          dielectric material and planarizing the oxide using a CMP                          
          process.  Further details of this appealed subject matter are set                  
          forth in representative independent claim 1 which reads as                         
          follows:                                                                           
                1. A process for making a multi-layer interconnect,                          
          comprising:                                                                        
                depositing directly on a pad and lines of a topographical                    
          substrate a low-k dielectric material having a height greater on                   
          said pad than on said lines, wherein said low-k dielectric                         
          material has a dielectric constant of less than 2.8;                               
                depositing an oxide on said low-k dielectric material;                       
                planarizing said oxide using a CMP process;                                  
                making via holes through said oxide and said low-k                           
          dielectric material, wherein prior to making via holes, all of                     
          said deposited low-k dielectric material remains as deposited on                   
          said pad and lines to form said multi-layer interconnect.                          
                The reference set forth below is relied upon by the examiner                 
          in the section 102 rejection before us:                                            
          Xu et al. (Xu)              6,207,554             Mar. 27, 2001                    
                                      (filed Jul. 12, 1999)                                  
                All of the appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Xu.1                                              

                1 As indicated on page 4 of the brief, the claims on appeal                  
          will stand or fall together.  Accordingly, in assessing the                        
                                                                        (continued...)       
                                             2                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007