Appeal No. 2004-0909 Page 7 Application No. 09/053,398 instruction that specifies the type of the instruction . . . and the structure of the data on which it operates." Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary 279 (2d ed. 1994)(copy attached). In short, persons skilled in the art would have known that an opcode is a part of an instruction. The claim excludes instructions from the contents transferred from the registers. Accordingly, we are unpersuaded that Sites’ transferring of instructions or parts of instructions would have suggested the claimed limitations. Therefore, we reverse the obviousness rejection of claim 1; of claims 2-7, which depend therefrom; of claim 8; of claims 9-14, which depend therefrom; of claim 15; of claims 16-20, which depend therefrom; of clam 21; and of claims 22-26, which depend therefrom. CONCLUSION In summary, the rejection of claims 1-26 under § 103(a) is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007