Appeal No. 2004-0941
Application No. 09/180,901
apex of the convex shaped transverse face of Manent (Fig. 4) with
a second radius smaller than the first radius of the transverse
concave and convex faces. In other words, Shindo would not have
been suggestive of a concavity in the apex of a convex shaped
transverse face of a construction element. It is for this reason
that the rejection of claim 17 is not sound.
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained any of
the rejections on appeal.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007