Ex Parte Turner et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            
                                                                                            Paper No. 23                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     __________                                                          
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
                               Ex parte C. ALEXANDER TURNER JR., ERIN HILBUN.                                            
                                      GREGORY DONOHO, JOHN SCOVILLE,                                                     
                                      FRANK WATTLER, GLENN FRIEDFRICH,                                                   
                                    ALEJANDRO ABUIN, BRIAN ZAMBROWICZ,                                                   
                                               and ARTHUR T. SANDS                                                       
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 2004-1040                                                     
                                              Application No. 09/770,643                                                 
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
              Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
              GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                        
              rejection of claims 1-3 and 6-8, all of the claims in the application.  Claims 1 and 3 are                 
              representative and read as follows:                                                                        
                     1.     An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising the nucleotide sequence of                      
                            SEQ ID NO:1.                                                                                 
                     3.     An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence that                      
                            encodes the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2.                                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007