Ex Parte Swope - Page 10




                  Appeal No. 2004-1052                                                                                      Page 10                       
                  Application No. 09/848,132                                                                                                              


                  claims 20, 21, 26 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Winninger                                                     
                  in view of Semin is reversed.                                                                                                           


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 15 to 19 and 22 to                                                 
                  25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed and the decision of the examiner to reject                                                      
                  claims 15 to 17, 19 to 24, 26 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                 
                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              





                                             CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                  )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )         APPEALS                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )             AND                                      
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JENNIFER D. BAHR                                      )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007