Ex Parte Porter et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2004-1058                                                        
          Application 09/584,053                                                      


               Claims 12 through 18, 20 and 22 through 29 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Deneen.                    


               Claims 12 through 18, 20 and 22 through 29 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deneen in               
          view of Clements.                                                           


               Attention is directed to the main, supplemental and reply              
          briefs and to the second final rejection and answer for the                 
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner regarding           
          the merits of these rejections.                                             


                                    DISCUSSION                                        


          I. The 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection of claims 12             
          through 18, 20 and 22 through 29                                            

               According to the examiner, the appellants’ specification               
          fails to comply with the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C.                
          § 112, first paragraph, because                                             






                                         -4-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007