Appeal No. 2004-1058 Application 09/584,053 Claims 12 through 18, 20 and 22 through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Deneen. Claims 12 through 18, 20 and 22 through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deneen in view of Clements. Attention is directed to the main, supplemental and reply briefs and to the second final rejection and answer for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner regarding the merits of these rejections. DISCUSSION I. The 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, rejection of claims 12 through 18, 20 and 22 through 29 According to the examiner, the appellants’ specification fails to comply with the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, because -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007