Ex Parte JAPP et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication in a law journal                 
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                               Paper No. 24           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                   Ex parte ROBERT MAYNARD JAAP, PAMELA LULKOSKI,                     
                            JEFFREY McKEVENY, JAN OBRZUT                              
                              and KENNETH LYNN POTTER                                 
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2004-1073                                  
                             Application No. 09/046,105                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative             
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3,             
          4, 6-9, 11, 12, 14, 23-25, 28-30, 33 and 34.  Claim 1 is                    
          illustrative:                                                               
               1.  A woven fiberglass cloth comprising an oxide or salt of            
          at least one member selected from the group consisting of Cu, Cr,           
          and mixtures thereof in an amount sufficient to reduce the glass            
          transmittance of UV light having a wavelength of 365 nanometers;            
                                         -1-                                          



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007