Ex Parte Otter - Page 4


         Appeal No. 2004-1125                                                       
         Application No. 09/923,998                                                 

              selected from the group consisting of                                 
              polyetheretherketone and polysulfone.                                 
                   21.  The heat exchanger component as recited in                  
              claim 1 wherein a first fluid flows through said                      
              plurality of flow passages and a second fluid flows                   
              around said plurality of flow passages, and said first                
              fluid and said second fluid exchange heat.                            
                   24.  The refrigerant cycle as recited in claim 13                
              wherein said low surface energy substance is selected                 
              from the group consisting of polyetheretherketone and                 
              polysulfone.                                                          
                   28.  The heat exchanger component as recited in                  
              claim 1 wherein said oil forms droplets on said low                   
              surface energy coating.                                               
              In addition to the appellant’s admitted prior art, the                
         examiner relies on the following prior art references as                   
         evidence of unpatentability:                                               
         Erwin                   3,925,149           Dec. 09, 1975                 
         Lowenstein et al.        5,992,508           Nov. 30, 1999                 
              (Lowenstein)                                                          
         Ogawa et al.             EP 0 864 622 A2     Sep. 16, 1998                 
              (Ogawa)(published                                                     
              EP application)                                                       
              The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                        
              I. claims 1 through 3, 7, 8, 11, 18, 28, and 30 under 35              
                   U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Erwin (examiner’s              
                   answer mailed Jan. 13, 2004, paper 15, page 3; final             
                   Office action, pages 2-3);                                       




                                         4                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007