Ex Parte Haslwanter et al - Page 3


                Appeal No.  2004-1188                                                   Page 3                 
                Application No.  09/940,784                                                                    
                      The examiner finds (id.), “Gilbert teaches [a] nasal spray composition                   
                comprising active agent, such as … oxymetazoline hydrochloride….”  In addition,                
                the examiner finds (id.), Parnell teaches a nasal spray composition comprising,                
                inter alia, PVP as a thickener.  According to the examiner (Answer, page 6),                   
                “Parnell is relied upon solely for the teachings that more than one polymer can                
                be used as additive agents in a nasal spray composition.”  To be clear, however,               
                we note that the examiner does not identify, and we do not find, a teaching in                 
                Parnell that suggests using two or more PVPs having different average                          
                molecular weights in the same composition.  Nevertheless, the examiner                         
                concludes (Answer, page 4),                                                                    
                      it would have been prima facie [sic] obvious for one of ordinary skill                   
                      in the art to modify Shimizu’s formulation with the active drug, and                     
                      the aqueous carriers in view of the teachings of Gilbert, and PVP                        
                      as thickening agent in view of the teachings of Parnell to obtain the                    
                      claimed invention, because the references teach the advantageous                         
                      results in the use of aqueous nasal formulation useful for the                           
                      treatment of respiratory diseases, such as allergy, itchy nose, and                      
                      runny nose.  The expected result would be an aqueous nasal spray                         
                      formulation comprising oxymetazoline HCL and PVP that is stable,                         
                      alleviate dryness, and reduce nose-irritation.                                           
                      Conspicuous by its absence, is the failure of the examiner to identify a                 
                teaching, in the cited prior art, of the use of two or more linear polymers of 1-              
                Vinyl-2-pyrrolidone having different average molecular weights.  Upon review of                
                the cited prior art, we find that while the cited references teach that PVP is                 
                available in a variety of different average molecular weights, none of the                     
                references relied upon teach or suggest the use of two or more PVPs having                     
                different average molecular weights in the same composition.  As appellants                    
                point out (Reply Brief, page 2), “[a]bsent the mention in any reference of record              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007