Appeal No. 2004-1200
Application No. 09/871,996
deficiencies of Levine and Schein relative to the subject matter
recited in parent claims 1 and 29, we also shall not sustain the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 6, 13,
19 and 34 as being unpatentable over Levine in view of Schein and
Burge, the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent
claims 7 through 9 and 35 through 37 as being unpatentable over
Levine in view of Schein, Burge and Wong, or the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 10 through 12 and
38 through 40 as being unpatentable over Levine in view of
Schein, Burge and the Computer Associates references.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007