Appeal No. 2004-1212 Page 7 Application No. 09/316,624 Summary The examiner has not adequately shown that those skilled in the art would have considered the claims indefinite, or that the claimed method was identically disclosed in the prior art. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e) and 112, second paragraph, are reversed. REVERSED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EG/dymPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007