Appeal No. 2004-1240 Application No. 09/742,691 Declarations in their entirety, and have read both appellant’s and the examiner’s position on each of these Declarations, and our determinations are set forth below. A. Eric Polesuk’s Second Declaration With regard to Eric Polesuk’s Second Declaration, appellant summarizes the statements made in this Declaration, beginning on page 5 of the brief, as follows. Polesuk submits that a jagged-like pattern formed in the cardboard of the box is not considered an integrated cutting blade; simply a rough edge. Second Declaration, paragraph 2. Polesuk also states that although self- dispensing boxes having an integrated cutting blade have been around in the food service industry for many years for the purpose of cutting rolls of aluminum foil and plastic film, no such device was used in the Beauty Industry and dispensed from a box having a width between approximately 3.5” to 6.0”. Second Declaration, paragraph 3. Polesuk states that prior to the present invention, there was no self-dispensing box for the Beauty Industry having the features of the present invention, and concludes that it could not have been obvious to a person in the Beauty Industry who had knowledge of the prior art to have made the product of the present invention. Second Declaration, paragraph 3. Polesuk states that other persons in the Beauty Industry had been trying to solve the problem of efficiently dispensing hair foil for many years. Persons in the Beauty Industry had knowledge of dispensers for rolls of aluminum foil and plastic films used in the food service industry. These same persons had knowledge of the hair 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007