Ex Parte DUNN et al - Page 11



          Appeal No. 2004-1304                                                        
          Application 08/730,625                                                      


          temperature indicating device therein should be made of                     
          unbreakable and pliable material such that the device will not              
          injure a patient even if pressure is applied against the device             
          by the patient.  Moreover, we again make note of the examiner’s             
          position (answer, page 5) that the plastic coating of McNaughtan            
          is “relatively soft” when compared to typical metals, such as               
          stainless steel, used in the making of food serving and eating              
          utensils, and further observe that appellants have provided no              
          cogent argument specifically addressing this aspect of the                  
          examiner’s position.                                                        

                    Since, in our view, McNaughtan reasonably teaches a               
          utensil like that broadly set forth in claims 1 and 2 on appeal,            
          the examiner’s rejection of those claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)           
          will be sustained.                                                          

                    Claim 6 on appeal depends from claim 1 and specifies              
          that in the utensil of claim 1 the relatively soft plastic                  
          material “comprises polyvinyl chloride and a thermochromatic                



                                          11                                          




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007