Appeal No. 2004-1586
Application No. 10/132,863
and if they were available prior to the filing date of this
application, determine whether they alone, or together with Edge
and Sports Pub, affect the patentability of the subject matter
defined by claims 1 and 4 through 9.
CONCLUSION
In summary:
1) The examiner’s rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as anticipated by the disclosure of Kasprzycki is affirmed;
2) The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Edge and Kasprzycki is affirmed;
3) The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Edge and Kebarian is reversed;
4) The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Sports Pub and Kasprzycki is affirmed;
5) The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 4 through 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined
disclosures of Sports Pub and Kebarian is reversed;
6) The examiner’s rejection of claims 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C.
18
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007