Ex Parte Gulick - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1596                                                         
          Application No. 09/544,858                                                   

          diagram for a legacy Low Pin Count (LPC) bus transaction on a                
          single protocol system includes a plurality of different START               
          signals, of which only the last signal 350A is used by the target            
          device (specification, page 12).  According to Appellant’s                   
          invention, depicted in Figure 6, the value of the captured START             
          signal 650A indicates that START signal 350A and the following               
          signal correspond to standard LPC bus transaction (id.).  Thus,              
          any device addressed by the standard LPC bus transaction ignores             
          the extended LPC transactions.                                               
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                 
               1.   A method for performing transactions over a bus,                   
          comprising:                                                                  
               transmitting a first signal;                                            
               transmitting a second signal indicating a transaction                   
          request encoded according to at least one of a first protocol and            
          a second protocol;                                                           
               determining that the first protocol is used by a first                  
          device to decode the transaction using the first signal and the              
          second signal; and                                                           
               determining that the second protocol is used by a second                
          device to decode the transaction using the second signal, the                
          second device being adapted to ignore the first signal.                      
               The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting            
          the claims:                                                                  
               Kowalski                 5,420,412            May  30, 1995             
               Hewitt                   5,898,886            Apr. 27, 1999             
                                          2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007