Ex Parte Mizuno - Page 1





           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte YOICHI MIZUNO                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1862                                 
                              Application No. 09/784,041                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     

          Before OWENS, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to            
          allow claim 2, which is the only claim pending in this                      
          application.                                                                
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to a pneumatic tire having a             
          bead portion wherein a specific rubber composition is employed in           
          the bead portion of the tire.  An understanding of the invention            
          can be derived from a reading of appealed claim 2, which is                 
          reproduced below.                                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007