The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YOICHI MIZUNO ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1862 Application No. 09/784,041 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claim 2, which is the only claim pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellant's invention relates to a pneumatic tire having a bead portion wherein a specific rubber composition is employed in the bead portion of the tire. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of appealed claim 2, which is reproduced below.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007