Appeal No. 2004-1992 Application No. 10/223,982 concedes that the bow of Ramirez does not include at least one die cut piece comprising a spine and at least one design artifact extending from the spine. To make up for this deficiency, the examiner turns to Ruff. Ruff, in pertinent part, is directed to a decorative garland (see Figures 1 and 2) comprising an elongated base ribbon 11 and a plurality of fully annealed metal wires 18, 19 spirally wrapped around the base ribbon. The elongated base ribbon includes a plurality of spaced apart decorative members 12 extending generally perpendicular from the longitudinal axis of the ribbon. Extending from the decorative members are a plurality of fingers 13 having decorations or symbols 16. As explained at column 2, lines 27-32, because the wires are fully annealed, the garland may be twisted and formed into any particular position and the garland will stay in that position without springing back. In rejecting claims 1, 3-34 and 36-39 as being unpatentable over Ramirez in view of Ruff, the examiner maintains that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007