Ex Parte Price et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2004-1992                                                        
          Application No. 10/223,982                                                  


          concedes that the bow of Ramirez does not include at least one              
          die cut piece comprising a spine and at least one design artifact           
          extending from the spine.  To make up for this deficiency, the              
          examiner turns to Ruff.                                                     
               Ruff, in pertinent part, is directed to a decorative garland           
          (see Figures 1 and 2) comprising an elongated base ribbon 11 and            
          a plurality of fully annealed metal wires 18, 19 spirally wrapped           
          around the base ribbon.  The elongated base ribbon includes a               
          plurality of spaced apart decorative members 12 extending                   
          generally perpendicular from the longitudinal axis of the ribbon.           
          Extending from the decorative members are a plurality of fingers            
          13 having decorations or symbols 16.  As explained at column 2,             
          lines 27-32, because the wires are fully annealed, the garland              
          may be twisted and formed into any particular position and the              
          garland will stay in that position without springing back.                  
               In rejecting claims 1, 3-34 and 36-39 as being unpatentable            
          over Ramirez in view of Ruff, the examiner maintains that it                
          would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in              







                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007