Appeal No. 2004-1992
Application No. 10/223,982
of a plurality of foil-like strips 24b and a snowflake 22b having
radiating arms. The examiner should consider whether the foil
assembly of Gruenke comprises a “decorative bow” as called for in
the preamble of appellants’ claims and, if so, whether the
plurality of ribbon strands and die cut piece having a spine and
at least one artifact called for in the body of the appealed
claims read on the snowflake 22b having radiating arms of
Gruenke.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
LJS:hh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007