Appeal No. 2004-2173 Application No. 09/970353 overcomes or provides for the deficiencies we have identified above with regard to the basic combination of prior art references applied against independent claims 1, 6 and 26. Accordingly, the examiner's rejection of dependent claims 3, 4, 22, 24 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) will likewise not be sustained. In light of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 14 and 19 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. MCQUADE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CEF/lbg 88Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007