Ex Parte Baldonado et al - Page 8



            Appeal No. 2004-2226                                                                        
            Application NO. 10/066,421                                                                  

            bond 6a and to its connection surface 4 with a wedge (i.e.,                                 
            stitch) bond 6b, and each wire 7 is attached to its connection                              
            surface 4 with a wedge bond 7b and to its conductor path 3 with a                           
            ball bond 7a.                                                                               
                  Anticipation is established only when a single prior art                              
            reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency,                            
            each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA Corp. v.                                
            Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ                              
            385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                                                  
                  In the present case, Schmidt does not meet the limitation in                          
            independent claim 1, or the corresponding limitations in                                    
            independent claims 8 and 16, requiring a bonding wire to be                                 
            attached to a lead with a stitch bond.  Schmidt’s bonding wires 7                           
            are attached to their associated leads (conductor paths 3) by                               
            ball bonds 7a.                                                                              
                  Thus, Schmidt does not disclose each and every element of                             
            the invention recited in independent claims 1, 8 and 16.                                    
            Therefore, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)                             
            rejection of claims 1, 8 and 16, and dependent claims 2, 4                                  
            through 7, 9 through 15 and 17 through 21, as being anticipated                             
            by Schmidt.                                                                                 


                                                   8                                                    



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007