Ex Parte Pribonic et al - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2004-2291                                                                                  Page 2                     
                 Application No. 10/318,506                                                                                                       



                                                              BACKGROUND                                                                          
                         The appellants' invention is generally related to permanent magnet linear brakes                                         
                 and is more particularly directed to eddy brake systems for movable cars, for example,                                           
                 rail supported cars, go-carts, elevator cars, conveyor cars, and roller coaster cars,                                            
                 among others (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the                                       
                 appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                                               


                         The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                          
                 appealed claims are:                                                                                                             
                 Mutaguchi et al. (Mutaguchi)                       5,778,797                          July 14, 1998                              
                 Hazelton et al. (Hazelton)                         6,104,108                          Aug. 15, 2000                              


                         Claims 21 to 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                                          
                 Mutaguchi.                                                                                                                       


                         Claims 1 to 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                                             
                 over Mutaguchi in view of Hazelton.                                                                                              













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007