Ex Parte Pribonic et al - Page 8




                 Appeal No. 2004-2291                                                                                  Page 8                     
                 Application No. 10/318,506                                                                                                       



                 Figure 17E of Mutaguchi shows the utilization of magnet means 8 and conductive                                                   
                 means 7 disposed on opposite sides of the car 5.                                                                                 


                         Figures 17A-17H of Mutaguchi show the utilization of magnets 8 and conductive                                            
                 plates 7 disposed on the same side of the damping mass 5, not on opposite sides of the                                           
                 damping mass 5.  Figures 17A-17H of Mutaguchi illustrate four sides of the damping                                               
                 mass 5 (an upper side (top), a lower side (bottom), a left side and a right side).                                               
                 Mutaguchi's magnets 8 and conductive plates 7 are all disposed on the lower side                                                 
                 (bottom) of the damping mass 5.  Thus, claims 25 and 26 are not anticipated by                                                   
                 Mutaguchi.                                                                                                                       


                         For the reasons set forth above, claims 25 and 26 are not anticipated by                                                 
                 Mutaguchi.  Therefore, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 25 and 26 under                                             
                 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                                                                                                  


                 The obviousness rejection                                                                                                        
                         We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 to 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                               


                         In the obviousness rejection before us in this appeal, the examiner (answer, p. 6)                                       
                 ascertained that Mutaguchi lacked ''a plurality of flux steering magnets disposed in gaps                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007