Appeal No. 2004-2291 Page 10
Application No. 10/318,506
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to
20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 6, 11 to 21 and
23 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being
unpatentable over claims 1 to 7, 9 and 11 to 20 of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,650 B1 is
affirmed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims 21 to 24 under the judicially
created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over
claims 2 to 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,533,083 B1 is affirmed; the decision of the examiner
to reject claims 21 to 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed; and the decision of the
examiner to reject claims 1 to 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007