Interference No. 105,019 Correa v. Roberts Re-Declaration of Interference This interference is herein re-declared as follows: The parties' claims corresponding to the count are: Correa's application claims 1-3, and 5-13 Roberts' claims 14-16,18-20, 22, and 23 Priority of Invention Junior party Correa has not alleged a date of invention or conception with respect to the subject matter of the count prior to the senior party's earliest accorded benefit date of March 3 1, 1992. Junior party Correa also has not attacked the accorded benefit dates of senior party Roberts. Accordingly, it is time appropriate to enter judgment against junior party Correa. Itis ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is herein entered against junior party MAURO F.C. CORREA, TELMA SIN]CIO and FERNANDA S. ACHCAR; FURTHER ORDERED junior party MAURO F.C. CORREA, TELMA SINICIO and FERNANDA S. ACHCAR is not entitled to its claims 1-3 and 5-13 which correspond to the count; - 36Page: Previous 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007