CORREA et al. V. ROBERTS et al. - Page 37





               Interference No. 105,019                                                                                                
               Correa v. Roberts                                                                                                       
                       FURTHER ORDERED that senior party JOHN D. ROBERTS and CLAUDE P.                                                 
               MANCEL are not entitled to its patent claims 14-16, 18-20, 22 and 23;                                                   
                       FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                                
               the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and                                                          
                       FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved                                
               application or patent of the parties.                                                                                   





























                                                                 37                                                                    







Page:  Previous  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007