Interference 103,781
162 F.3d 1140, 49 USPQ2d 1128 (Fed. Cir. 1998)(Paper No. 118,
Exhibit A);
denying Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 6 (Paper No. 83)
under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(2) to redefine the subject matter of the
interference by adding proposed Claims 44 and 45 to Fischhoff’s
involved U.S. Application 08/434,105, filed May 3, 1995 (Paper
No. 84), and designating the new claims as corresponding to the
count;
deferring to final hearing Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 7
(Paper No. 85) under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that
Claims 1-12 of Adang’s U.S. Patent 5,380,831 (FX 11), issued
January 10, 1995, are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or
§ 103;
dismissing Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 8 (Paper No. 86)
under 37 CFR § 1.633(f) to be accorded benefit of the October 9,
1992, filing date of Fischhoff’s U.S. Application 07/959,506; the
February 12, 1990, filing date of Fischhoff’s U.S. Application
07/476,661; and the February 24, 1989, filing date of U.S.
Application 07/315,355, for Fischhoff’s Proposed Counts 2, 3,
and 4 (Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 4, Paper No. 81);
denying Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 9 (Paper No. 87)
under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Claims 1-12 of Adang
et al., U.S. Patent 5,380,831, issued January 10, 1995, are
-21-
Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007