Interference 103,781 II. asking the Board for leave to file preliminary motions under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that: Barton is not entitled to a patent containing Barton’s claims designated as corresponding to Count 2 in view of Monsanto’s alleged violation of 37 CFR § 1.56; and Fischhoff is not entitled to a patent containing Fischhoff’s claims designated as corresponding to Count 2 in view of Monsanto’s alleged violation of 37 CFR § 1.56; III. asking the Board for leave to file a miscellaneous motion under 37 CFR § 1.635 for additional discovery under 37 CFR § 1.687(c) relating to Monsanto’s alleged violation of 37 CFR § 1.56; IV. asking the Board for leave to file a preliminary motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Barton’s Claims 21 and 22 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written description requirement); V. asking the Board for leave to file a preliminary motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Fischhoff’s Claim 40 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written description requirement); VI. asking the Board for leave to file a preliminary motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(1) to redefine the interfering -26-Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007