Interference 103,781
§ 1.687(c) relating to Monsanto’s purported violation of 37 CFR
§ 1.56 (Paper No. 154);
granting Adang’s request for leave to file a preliminary
motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Claims 21 and 22
of Barton’s Application 07/827,906, filed January 30, 1992, are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written
description requirement)(Paper No. 154);
denying Adang’s request for leave to file a preliminary
motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Claim 40 of
Fischhoff’s Application 08/827,906, filed May 3, 1995, is
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written
description requirement)(Paper No. 154);
denying Adang’s request for leave to file a preliminary
motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(1) to redefine the interfering
subject matter by excluding Claims 2, 3, 5-7, 9, 10, 13 and 14
of Adang’s U.S. Patent 5,380,831 from this interference (Paper
No. 154);
denying Adang’s request for leave to renew or amend a motion
under 37 CFR § 1.635 said to have been filed earlier “for
discovery under 37 CFR § 1.687(c) Re: Derivation of Invention”
(Paper No. 154); and
-30-
Page: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007