Interference 103,781
A. Whether Fischhoff’s Claims 41-43 are separately
patentable from the interference count and should not
be designated as corresponding to the count
(Fischhoff’s Preliminary Motion 10 (Paper No. 88) and
Decision deferring judgment on Fischhoff’s Preliminary
Motion 10 until final hearing (Paper No. 148); and
B. Priority of invention of the subject matter of the
interference count.
August 12, 2003 - An APJ entered an Order deferring judgment
on Fischhoff’s August 6, 2003, Rule 635 motion or contingent
motion to final hearing (Paper No. 217).
August 18, 2003 - Fischhoff filed Fischhoff Priority Brief
For Final Hearing (Paper No. 243).
August 18, 2003 - Fischhoff filed Fischhoff Motions Brief
For Final Hearing On Deferred Fischhoff Motion 10 (Paper
No. 224).
August 18, 2003 - Adang filed Senior Party Adang’s Brief At
Final Hearing (Paper No. 223).
August 28, 2003 - Adang filed Adang’s Reply To Fischhoff’s
Motions Brief (Paper No. 245).
August 28, 2003 - Adang filed Adang’s Reply To Fischhoff’s
Priority Brief (Paper No. 246).
August 28, 2003 - Fischhoff filed Fischhoff’s Reply Brief
For Final Hearing (Paper No. 247).
August 28, 2003 - Fischhoff filed Fischhoff Motion To
Suppress Evidence (Paper No. 248).
-34-
Page: Previous 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007