Interference 103,781 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, and 112, which had been raised in preliminary motions with respect to claims of Adang’s involved U.S. Patent 5,380,831, issued January 10, 1995, designated as corresponding to Count 2 and deferred to final hearing (Paper No. 148); and II. expressing no desire to file any new preliminary motions. December 5, 2002 - Adang filed a Request to Strike Monsanto Motion or Set Period for Response Thereto (Paper No. 160) asking the Board alternatively to (1) strike Fischhoff and Barton’s Joint Comments Requesting Addition of Adang Patents to Interference (Paper No. 157); or (2) set a period for Adang to respond to Fischhoff’s and Barton’s Joint Comments Requesting Addition of Adang Patents to Interference (Paper No. 157). December 9, 2002 - Fischhoff and Barton filed Joint Comments Concerning Adang’s Request for Reconsideration and Responses Re: the Decision on Motions and Requests (Paper No. 161) asking the Board to (1) dismiss Adang’s request for reconsideration; (2) deny Adang’s requests for leave to file every new preliminary motion it proposes to file but for Adang’s request for leave to file a motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) to declare Barton’s Claims 21 and 22 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written description requirement); (3) set a time -28-Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007