BAI et al v. LAIKO et al - Page 52




                Interference No. 104,745                                                                                                      

                execute a Materiel Management Unit Request for Order (LX 1066)(hereinafter "Request for                                       
                Order") requesting that the laser be repaired by Laser Science and including the notation                                     
                "Estimated cost $2,100."  Baldwin Decl. (LX 1074) ¶ 53.   Then, in accordance with routine                                    
                practice, he submitted the order to Ms. Schwartz on the same or on the following Monday                                       
                (5 January).  Id.   Ms. Schwartz received the Request for Order on 2 January (Friday), 5 January                              
                (Monday), or 6 January (Tuesday), altered it by changing "Estimated cost" to "not to exceed,"                                 
                and then submitted it within one or two working days to the Materiel Management Unit in                                       
                accordance with routine practice.  Schwartz Decl. (LX 1062) ¶ 10.  As indicated by the notations                              
                "MRD" and "01/06/98" printed in the lower left-hand corner of the Request for Order, it was                                   
                processed on that date by Matthew Denny, the Senior Storekeeper of the Materiel Management                                    
                Unit.  Denny Decl. (LX 1068) ¶¶ 3, 6.  On that date, it was assigned number DP8964R231,                                       
                which appears in the left-hand bottom corner.  Id.                                                                            
                         The foregoing evidence demonstrates reasonable diligence from just prior to                                          
                19 December 1997 up to 6 January 1998.                                                                                        
                         Denny's testimony that he contacted Laser Science on either 6 or 7 January in accordance                             
                with routine and ordinary practice, Denny Decl. (LX 1068) ¶ 7, is unconvincing because it is                                  
                contradicted by the Request for Order and by the Laser Science internal "Order" document                                      








                                                                   - 52 -                                                                     





Page:  Previous  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007