Interference No. 104,745 Baldwin Decl. (LX 1074) ¶ 40. At that time, Walls was responsible for the management of resources in Dr. Burlingame's laboratory (Room C-18). Walls Decl. (LX 1079) ¶ 3. After it was discovered (by an unidentified person) that the laser was not working, Baldwin Decl. (LX 1074) ¶ 42; Walls Decl. (LX 1079) ¶ 9, Walls made an unsuccessful attempt to repair the laser, during which he conducted tests that persuaded him that the problem was in either the power supply or the plasma cartridge. Walls Decl. (LX 1079) ¶ 10. Thereafter, on 26 November 1997, which is prior to Bai's 19 December 1997 conception date, Dr. Baldwin made the above-noted contact with Laser Science regarding repair of the laser. Ms. Ferreira, who is the "D.F." identified in that form as the "LSI CONTACT," explained that this contact date is established by the "11/26/97" date appearing after "CONTACT DATE" in the upper box on the Laser Science form (LX 1059), i.e., the box labeled "RETURN MATERIAL AUTHORIZATION." Ferreira Decl. (LX 1058) ¶ 4. Ms. Ferreira also explained that in accordance with customary and standard Laser Science procedures, the Return Material Authorization (RMA) number R1733 which appears on the form would have been given to Dr. Baldwin on the contact date for inclusion with the laser when shipped to Laser Science. Id. The date when UCSF shipped the laser to Laser Science has not been established with any certainty but necessarily must have preceded Bai's 19 December 1997 conception date, which is also the date on which the laser was checked by a Laser Science technician, as indicated on the Laser Science form. Ferreira Decl. (LX 1058) ¶ 7. The technician's notes in the bottom box of the form identify the problem as a "Bad Pc," i.e., bad plasma cartridge, suggest replacing the junction box and HV cable as well, and estimated the cost of these repairs as $1,795 for the - 47 -Page: Previous 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007