BAI et al v. LAIKO et al - Page 44




                Interference No. 104,745                                                                                                      

                than Hitzeman controls.  Under Burroughs, Bai's argument fails because "[a]n inventor's belief                                
                that his invention will work . . . [is] irrelevant to conception," 40 F.3d at 1228, 32 USPQ2d at                              
                1920.                                                                                                                         
                         For the foregoing reasons, we are crediting Laiko with a conception date of 30 October                               
                1997.                                                                                                                         
                Laiko's case for diligence                                                                                                    
                         As noted supra, the critical period during for which Laiko must show reasonable                                      
                diligence runs from just prior to Bai's 19 December 1997 conception up to Laiko's 14 March                                    
                1998 actual reduction to practice.  35 U.S.C. § 102(g); Mahurkar, 79 F.3d at 1578, 38 USPQ2d                                  
                at 1291; Monsanto, 261 F.3d at 1368, 59 USPQ2d at 1938.  Consequently, we need not consider                                   
                Bai's argument that Laiko has not failed to show reasonable diligence throughout period between                               
                30 October 1997 and 19 December 1997.  BOppBr 47-53.                                                                          
                         Diligence can be shown by evidence of activity aimed at reducing the invention to                                    
                practice, either actually or constructively, and/or by legally adequate excuses for inactivity.  As                           
                explained in Griffith v. Kanamaru, 816 F.2d 624, 626, 2 USPQ2d 1361, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1987):                                   
                         A review of caselaw on excuses for inactivity in reduction to practice reveals a                                     
                         common thread that courts may consider the reasonable everyday problems and                                          
                         limitations encountered by an inventor.  See, e.g., Bey v. Kollonitsch, 806 F.2d                                     
                         1024, 231 USPQ 967  (Fed. Cir. 1986)(delay in filing excused where attorney                                          
                         worked on a group of related applications and other applications contributed                                         
                         substantially to the preparation of Bey's application); Reed v. Tornqvist,  436 F.2d                                 
                         501, 168 USPQ 462 (CCPA 1971) (concluding it is not unreasonable for inventor                                        
                         to delay completing a patent application until after returning from a three week                                     
                         vacation in Sweden, extended by illness of inventor's father); Keizer v. Bradley,                                    
                         270 F.2d 396, 47 CCPA 709, 123 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1959)(delay excused where                                              
                         inventor, after producing a component for a color television, delayed filing to                                      

                                                                   - 44 -                                                                     





Page:  Previous  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007