BAI et al v. LAIKO et al - Page 39




                Interference No. 104,745                                                                                                 

                The structure designated as "API interface of 'Mariner' instrument" is the atmospheric pressure                          
                interface of a Mariner ESI (electrospray ionization) atmospheric-pressure ortho-TOF mass                                 
                spectrometer.   LX 1041, at 2-3.   Although the figures do not show an "atmospheric-pressure                             
                ionization chamber" (paragraph a of the Laiko count alternative), Bai does not challenge Laiko's                         
                contention that the presence of such a chamber is implied by the reference to pressure as an                             
                adjustable parameter in the proposal at page 4, paragraph b, which reads: "In the case of                                
                successful detection of (may be [sic]) weak APMALDI signal, a very broad range of                                        
                experimental parameters may be adjusted.  These include bath gas nature, pressure and                                    
                temperature, special matrixes (including liquids)."  Nor does Bai deny that the recited "sample                          
                support positioned within said ionization chamber" (paragraph b) and "sample . . . comprising an                         
                analyte embedded in an ionization-assisting matrix" (first paragraph c) read on the illustrated                          
                "MALDI Target."  However, Bai does dispute Laiko's contention that this exhibit establishes                              
                conception of the recited "laser for illuminating said sample, to induce . . . release of said analyte                   
                ions from said sample, and to induce ionization of said analyte to form said analyte ions" (second                       
                paragraph c)  and the recited "interface connecting said ionization chamber and said                                     
                spectrometer for capturing said analyte ions released from said sample and for transporting said                         
                analyte ions to said spectrometer" (paragraph d).  According to Bai, the language in this proposal                       
                and the testimony of Drs. Laiko and Burlingame reveal skepticism about the operability of the                            
                proposed AP-MALDI apparatus, with the result that Laiko has not demonstrated a reasonable                                
                expectation of success in generating sufficient analyte ions and transporting them to the                                



                                                                 - 39 -                                                                  





Page:  Previous  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007