Interference No. 104,745 The structure designated as "API interface of 'Mariner' instrument" is the atmospheric pressure interface of a Mariner ESI (electrospray ionization) atmospheric-pressure ortho-TOF mass spectrometer. LX 1041, at 2-3. Although the figures do not show an "atmospheric-pressure ionization chamber" (paragraph a of the Laiko count alternative), Bai does not challenge Laiko's contention that the presence of such a chamber is implied by the reference to pressure as an adjustable parameter in the proposal at page 4, paragraph b, which reads: "In the case of successful detection of (may be [sic]) weak APMALDI signal, a very broad range of experimental parameters may be adjusted. These include bath gas nature, pressure and temperature, special matrixes (including liquids)." Nor does Bai deny that the recited "sample support positioned within said ionization chamber" (paragraph b) and "sample . . . comprising an analyte embedded in an ionization-assisting matrix" (first paragraph c) read on the illustrated "MALDI Target." However, Bai does dispute Laiko's contention that this exhibit establishes conception of the recited "laser for illuminating said sample, to induce . . . release of said analyte ions from said sample, and to induce ionization of said analyte to form said analyte ions" (second paragraph c) and the recited "interface connecting said ionization chamber and said spectrometer for capturing said analyte ions released from said sample and for transporting said analyte ions to said spectrometer" (paragraph d). According to Bai, the language in this proposal and the testimony of Drs. Laiko and Burlingame reveal skepticism about the operability of the proposed AP-MALDI apparatus, with the result that Laiko has not demonstrated a reasonable expectation of success in generating sufficient analyte ions and transporting them to the - 39 -Page: Previous 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007