Appeal No. 2004-0288
Application No. 09/173,747
providing a prima facie case of obviousness, the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of claims 37-46, 49, 50, 54-56, 58, 65, 66, 68-71 and
75 over Knight, McDaniel and Lee cannot be sustained.
With respect to the rejection of the remaining claims, the
Examiner further relies on Hinode, Hiroshi, Arimoto, Hasegawa,
Watanabe and Miyagawa. However, none of these references
overcomes the deficiencies of Knight, McDaniel and Lee, alone or
in combination, as discussed above with respect to claim 37.
Therefore, we do not sustain any of the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejections of claims 47, 48, 51-53, 57, 59-64 and 67.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007