The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HISANORI FUJISAWA
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0636
Application No. 09/045,041
____________
HEARD: November 18, 2004
____________
Before FLEMING, GROSS, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 9 through 12, 14 through 24, 26 through 36,
and 38 through 44, which are all of the claims pending in this
application. On page 3 of the Answer, the examiner indicates
that claims 19, 31, and 43 would be allowable if rewritten to
include all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims. Accordingly, only claims 9 through 12, 14
through 18, 20 through 24, 26 through 30, 32 through 36, and 38
through 42, and 44 remain before us on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007