The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ZACHARY DAVID DIMENSTEIN
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1324
Application No. 09/495,1161
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2005
____________
Before THOMAS, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 14, 15, 17-19, 21-31, 33-35, 37-43, 45-47 and
49-56. Claims 1-13 have been indicated by the Examiner as being
allowable while claims 16, 20, 32, 36, 44 and 48 have been
canceled.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed February 01, 2000, which claims the
filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Provisional Application No.
60/118,133, filed February 1, 1999.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007